|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NYT Blames NRA
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The New York Times is going to tell you exactly who is responsible for the Orlando shooting massacre -- and it is the NRA.
Omar Mateen slaughtered 49 innocent people. He broadcast and pledged his loyalty to the terrorist Islamic State group. The red flags prior to his jihad attacks were numerous.
We don't need the New York Times to tell us who is responsible. |
| Comment by:
laker1
(6/18/2016)
|
| Gun shop owner called FBI on Omar, Disney called FBI on Omar, FBI investigates and takes him off watch list, has security job, but its the NRA's fault. |
| Comment by:
jac
(6/18/2016)
|
The NYT is as dishonest as Clinton.
Actually, if it is anybody's fault other than the murderer, I submit that it is the liberals that promulgated and maintain victim disarmament zones |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(6/18/2016)
|
| And the sun rose in the East this morning. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
