|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Two Women Prevent Robbery With Sex-Positive Self-Defense
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Two women working at a shop in California engaged in some sex-positive self-defense when they fended off a robber using the only weapons they had available: dildos.
Surveillance footage being circulated on Twitter shows a man with a gun attempting to rob Lotions and Lace, a shop in San Bernardino. Instead of opening the cash register, the two women behind the counter started launching dildos at the would-be robber to keep their store safe. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(12/17/2016)
|
Sigh:
Of course, when a robber comes in with a gun — whether you think it's real or fake — it's always unwise to fight back. Law enforcement encourages anyone in a stick-up situation to give the robbers money rather than risk their lives defending a cash register. But, since this was successful, and done in the most hilarious, sex positive way possible, we're glad these ladies defended themselves. |
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(12/18/2016)
|
| I don't believe dildos would stop bullets. Bad dangerous example cited here on top of bad humor attempt. Note the state the story took place in. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
