|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
CA: Police Responding To Gunshots Find 57 Weapons In Home
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Police seized 57 guns on Monday from a home at Laguna and Green streets in San Francisco where officers said a man had been wantonly firing shots. San Francisco resident Jack Dane, 63, was arrested peacefully and booked into San Francisco County Jail on a slew of gun-related charges, including negligent shooting and firing a gun at an inhabited residence.
|
| Comment by:
laker1
(9/7/2016)
|
| So if the guy had 57 personal cars when he negligently drove drunk would they confiscate all 57 cars. You know, since he can drive all 57 cars at the same time, just like he can shoot all 57 guns at the same time. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(9/7/2016)
|
1.) OK the guy was an @$$ and fired his guns off in a criminally irresponsible way.
2.) ONLY 57 guns? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
