|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
kangpc
(9/3/2016)
|
Two sociologists get together for a conversation and decide to revive this dead horse and beat on it some more.
The inherent human right to keep and bear arms is enshrined in and protected by the Second Amendment to our Constitution.
Driving a vehicle on the public roads is generally accepted to be a privilege subject to state control.
But just as every valid driver's license issued in our country is accepted as legitimate by every state, so too must every weapons permit issued in this country be recognized by every state.
Otherwise our federal system begins to crumble and collapse.
So let the politically driven sociologists retreat to their cave and continue their verbal onanism. But pay them no heed. |
| Comment by:
jac
(9/4/2016)
|
Sounds reasonable.
You don't need a drivers license or background check to buy an automobile.
You do not need a driver's license unless you want to drive said vehicle on public roads.
You do not have to license or register a vehicle unless you want to drive it on public roads.
A drivers license is valid in all 50 states.
You can buy a car if you are a convicted felon.
There are no restrictions on horsepower or how fast a car can go. Therefore, there should be no limits on automatic weapons. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
