|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Are ‘gun-free zones’ an acceptable form of discrimination?
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"A furor that erupted over the weekend and continues today over Indiana’s new 'Religious Freedom Restoration Act' provided Seattle Mayor Ed Murray an opportunity to condemn discrimination, noting that people cannot refuse service based on their religious beliefs."
"The fury over Indiana should give people an opportunity to reflect on all the different kinds of discrimination there are, and one in particular that seems to get a pass. That’s discrimination against gun owners, who have just as much right as anyone else to go about their daily lives and be left alone." ... |
Comment by:
Millwright66
(3/31/2015)
|
Maybe we need for someone to create a church/religion where firearms are iconic symbols ? Kudos for Indiana's RFRA IAC ! We've long observed how our "elitist leadership" is fascist. Now we're seeing yet another instance.
Mostly this a case of the kettle calling the pot black. Seems the LGBT types don't want "equality of treatment" from the society they inhabit. They want "exceptionalism" ! |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence. Thus when my eldest son asked me what he should have done had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908 [by an Indian extremist opposed to Gandhi's agreement with Smuts], whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defend me, I told him it was his duty to defend me even by using violence. Hence it was that I took part in the Boer War, the so-called Zulu Rebellion and [World War I]. Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. — Mohandas K. Gandhi, Young India, August 11, 1920 from Fischer, Louis ed.,The Essential Gandhi, 1962 |
|
|