|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NJ: Christie losing grip on gun control
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
But the story comes with one more twist; all of these machinations may not produce the desired result for Christie. Some gun-rights advocates aren’t happy about it, including the head of the New Jersey Second Amendment Rights Society, who said he was “dumbfounded” that any Second Amendment supporter would consider Christie’s proposal a success.
New Jersey gets it on gun control in a way few other states do, no matter how often or loudly the gun advocates insist that the path to curbing gun violence is arming the populace to the teeth. Christie used to understand as well — he was first motivated to run for state office because he wanted to preserve a ban on assault weapons, even though he now claims to have forgotten all about it. |
Comment by:
jac
(12/26/2015)
|
Christie is an anti-gun RINO who's new found support for the second amendment is only because of his aspirations to national office. Don't expect any support for gun rights beyond token gestures, and if he ever did win national office it is likely his anti-gun viewpoint will prevail.
He is the only republican running for President that I will not vote for if nominated. I will vote for a libertarian or another party candidate before I would vote for him. I suspect that enough people share my viewpoint, that if he ever got the nomination it would throw the election to the democrats. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. — Noah Webster in "An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution," 1787, in Paul Ford, ed., Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at p. 56 (New York, 1888). |
|
|