|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/19/2018)
|
| Were it not for that one, we wouldn't HAVE the "many freedoms" to which you refer. |
| Comment by:
jac
(5/19/2018)
|
If the stupid liberals would take their blinders off and get rid of the gun free victim disarmament school zones we would have less of these tragedies.
This attack was stopped by armed intervention. As long as these malcontents believe that they can shoot up schools and not be killed these attacks will continue.
There are over 270 school districts in Texas that have armed responsible teachers. There have not been any of the accidents and guns taken from teachers that the anti gun crowd have predicted. The only consequence has been that these schools have not experienced any shootings and the students are safe.
(Con't)
|
| Comment by:
jac
(5/19/2018)
|
You can not secure a school by any means other than armed security. One or two police officers is not enough as has been proven at Parkland, FL.
Allow anyone with a concealed carry permit to have a gun in schools and you will see far less of these school shootings. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
