|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(3/10/2020)
|
“But surely a guarantee of basic literacy skills must be implicit in the document in order for its express rights to have meaning.”
You can’t have it both ways: If a literacy test being required to exercise the right to vote is unconstitutional (which has been so held by the SOTUS), then Professor Tang’s analogy fails miserably. If being literate is assumed as necessary to exercise the right to vote, then such a test would have been upheld.
The fact is, illiterate people indeed DO have the right to vote, and Professor Tang must needs go back to the drawing board. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Today the taxing power, rather than chattel slavery, is the instrument by which the parasitical element of the population subsists. And that element, which includes politicians, panics at the slightest reduction in the state's power to plunder. Once you start liberating taxpayers, even a little tiny bit, nobody knows where it may end. —Joseph Sobran |
|
|
