|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
PP9
(10/2/2022)
|
I know I'd be more than happy to know which businesses to boycott... put up such a sign and yours is one of them, whether or not I am actually carrying. See if banning and alienating a large percentage of potential customers is good business. One of your competitors surely will be happy to accept your rejects, and their money.
A sign prohibiting certain objects would not likely be enough for trespass in and of itself. Prosecutions for trespass would only happen if the people carrying guns fail to leave when asked. If they should choose to disregard your signs, how are you going to know whom to ask to leave? You do know what the meaning of "concealed" is, right?
|
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|