| 
            
              | 
 | 
                
                
                  
                    | 
                              
                                   
                                        | 
                              
                              
                              NOTE! 
                               
                              This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
                      free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
                      Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
                      reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
                      any other living person besides the one who posted them.
                      Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
                              comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
                              Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
                              bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
                              other small-minded people.  Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
                              
                              
                                         |  
                         
                         The
                      Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
                         
                                       
                                            
                      
 
 
 
     
  
    | Comment by: 
     PHORTO
     (6/5/2018) |  
    | Article IV of the U.S. Constitution delegates to Congress the authority to mandate Full Faith and Credit, which would underwrite a national concealed-carry reciprocity law. Congress has the authority to enact one, and it should do so post-haste. 
 And it strains credibility to believe that arms in common use for over a century by the American public, and in fact the most popular arms favored by the people, have suddenly become "dangerous and unusual" and may therefore be banned wholesale. That ridiculous assertion is the worst kind of political alchemy, worthy of the Red Queen.
 |  
 
 |  |  
              | QUOTES
                TO REMEMBER |  
              | 
                    
                      | For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |  |  |