|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Viewer Outrage over ABC’s Comedy Cancellation; Boycott Talk
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
It makes fun of liberals, it is pro-Second Amendment, the leading character is a hunter who brings wild game home to the family dinner table and most important of all, it is reportedly a ratings sizzler. But ABC has cancelled the hit sitcom “Last Man Standing,” and now even Republican Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker has gotten in on the protest, tweeting to star Tim Allen, “Looks like ABC is playing politics with your show, despite decent ratings.” There is mounting public opinion that Walker hit the bull’s eye. Social media has erupted since the announcement late last week.
|
Comment by:
lbauer
(5/16/2017)
|
Seems like a golden opportunity for some cable channel to pick the show up. Would be especially sweet if they did so and placed it in its old time slot directly against whatever drek ABC puts in its place. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/16/2017)
|
OOPS! Sorry. Too popular. A 'redneck' hero? Well, now... we can't have THAT, now CAN we? |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|