
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NJ: Court Says 2nd Amendment Doesn’t Trump State's Strict Gun Laws
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A Bergen County man has lost his bid to fight the confiscation of his guns and ammunition following a domestic violence arrest and charges that he had high-capacity magazines and hollow-point ammunition. An appellate decision on Tuesday upheld a Superior Court judge’s earlier ruling that Arthur Vinogradsky was no longer qualified to be a gun owner even though the charges against him were eventually dropped. |
Comment by:
teebonicus
(5/25/2016)
|
Malfeasance.
Heller clearly established that bearing arms is a fundamental right, and that while some restrictions are permissible they cannot materially deny the right.
Whether or not one agrees with that holding, it IS precedent and is binding on lower courts. |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(5/25/2016)
|
And all this time I thought that the Constitution and Bill of Rights were the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND.
Ooooooooooooooooooops. (/sarcasm) |
Comment by:
stevelync
(5/26/2016)
|
And there are fools who thought that kristy Kreeme the supreme overlord of NJ, would make a good POTUS. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|