|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
VA: We can’t cure mental illness, but we can get guns off the streets
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The answer: We have nearly 400 million guns circulating in this country. Some are available to just about anyone who wants to take others down. Yes, some of the killers are mentally ill. But though it is not within our power to eliminate mental illness from our country, it is within our power to make it as difficult as possible for both the mentally ill and other would-be killers to get their hands on those guns. To borrow a phrase from the Supreme Court in its better days, the Second Amendment is not a suicide pact. As chief executive of our commonwealth, will Mr. Youngkin help us do this? |
| Comment by:
PP9
(12/4/2022)
|
No, you cannot get guns off the street. Cannot be done. You can 3-d print a gun these days... how are you ever going to stop that?
But if you try to get guns off the street with laws, you only deny guns to lawful people who would use them for self-defense, while doing nothing to stop the criminals who don't care about the law you passed. You would be taking away the means of self-defense of many innocent people, effectively sacrificing them to those who commit the ordinary kind of murder (that happens every day but doesn't make the national news) in order to try to save a few from a very rare kind of murder, the mass shooting.
Being willing to sacrifice thousands (and to violate the Constitution) to try to save a few dozen makes no sense. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
