|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
-none-
(6/29/2017)
|
antifa Archives - Geller Report
http://pamelageller.com/tag/antifa/
ANTIFA FASCISTS NOW CALLING FOR MURDER OF WHITE CHILDREN
the knife had to penetrate his skull, basically shot in the head:
pamelageller.com/2017/06/uk-police-fight-terror-with-baton.html/
officer describes fighting off 3 London Bridge knife-wielding jihadis ARMED WITH ONLY A BATON
PC WAYNE MARQUES SAYS: “I’M THINKING ‘THERE’S A KNIFE IN MY LEG WHILE I’M FIGHTING THE SECOND ONE AND THE THIRD ONE'”.
"now takes around 25 pills a day, was discharged from hospital..following a number of operations.
He has lost feeling in the right side of his head where nerves were severed, cannot walk unaided, and struggles to grip with his left hand.
the fight lasted for up to 90 seconds. |
| Comment by:
PP9
(6/29/2017)
|
"a bunch of white guys in Chicago have started a self-defense course to fight against the “history of white supremacy”"
So they're going to start voting Republican, the party of the president who ended slavery, rather than continue to support the party that supported slavery? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
