|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
kangpc
(9/3/2016)
|
Two sociologists get together for a conversation and decide to revive this dead horse and beat on it some more.
The inherent human right to keep and bear arms is enshrined in and protected by the Second Amendment to our Constitution.
Driving a vehicle on the public roads is generally accepted to be a privilege subject to state control.
But just as every valid driver's license issued in our country is accepted as legitimate by every state, so too must every weapons permit issued in this country be recognized by every state.
Otherwise our federal system begins to crumble and collapse.
So let the politically driven sociologists retreat to their cave and continue their verbal onanism. But pay them no heed. |
| Comment by:
jac
(9/4/2016)
|
Sounds reasonable.
You don't need a drivers license or background check to buy an automobile.
You do not need a driver's license unless you want to drive said vehicle on public roads.
You do not have to license or register a vehicle unless you want to drive it on public roads.
A drivers license is valid in all 50 states.
You can buy a car if you are a convicted felon.
There are no restrictions on horsepower or how fast a car can go. Therefore, there should be no limits on automatic weapons. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence. Thus when my eldest son asked me what he should have done had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908 [by an Indian extremist opposed to Gandhi's agreement with Smuts], whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defend me, I told him it was his duty to defend me even by using violence. Hence it was that I took part in the Boer War, the so-called Zulu Rebellion and [World War I]. Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. — Mohandas K. Gandhi, Young India, August 11, 1920 from Fischer, Louis ed.,The Essential Gandhi, 1962 |
|
|
