|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
FL: Bill Targets Kids Who Post Photos With an Illegal Firearm on Social Media
Submitted by:
David Williamson
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
As a prosecutor, Sen. Jason Pizzo watched helplessly as 20 mothers of murdered children would meet every Tuesday at Miami-Dade County’s Northside police station to discuss their kids’ cases and provide each other support. “If you asked by show of hands, how many arrests or closures have been made and clearance rate for those murders, maybe one or two hands go up,’’ he said, and many of them knew or suspected their child’s killers but prosecutors didn’t have the evidence to prove it.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(2/5/2020)
|
"data shows that black children and teens in Florida are three times more likely to be threatened by a firearm than children of whites and other races"
They are threatened by other blacks in their predominantly black environment. But admitting that truth just isn't convenient, is it?
If enacted into law, this bill will face a 1st Amendment challenge it will probably lose. If the posting contains articulable threats, that creates reasonable suspicion and perhaps even probable cause (depending), but without that critical element merely posting such a picture is protected speech.
In the desperation to achieve the stated goal they toss due process restrictions out the window. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
