|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
‘Mentally Ill’ Officer: Give Me Back My Gun
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Michael Keyes wants to buy a gun.
And the Pennsylvania state trooper knows how to use one: he carries several on duty, rotating between his Sig Sauer 227 handgun, a fully-automatic AR-15 and a Remington 870 shotgun. But while a very armed Keyes is trusted to serve and protect Pennsylvania, as soon as he clocks out, he is banned by state law from owning a gun for personal use.
|
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(3/13/2015)
|
| Seems obvious. In the eyes of the law one cannot be "cured" of a mental illness. We might want to consider applying the same strictures to those running for or holding public office. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(3/13/2015)
|
| Seems obvious. In the eyes of the law one cannot be "cured" of a mental illness. We might want to consider applying the same strictures to those running for or holding public office. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(3/13/2015)
|
| Seems obvious. In the eyes of the law one cannot be "cured" of a mental illness. We might want to consider applying the same strictures to those running for or holding public office. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(3/13/2015)
|
| Seems obvious. In the eyes of PA and federal law one cannot be cured of a "mental illness". We might want to consider applying the same strictures to those running for or holding public office. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
