|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
lostone1413
(6/27/2015)
|
| These shooting are staged events to further the Governments agenda on gun control. Funny you never heard of such things until the Government pulled off 9-11. If you don't think that the Government wouldn't do such a thing then your not old enough to remember the Bay Of Tonkin or you need to do some research |
| Comment by:
punch
(6/27/2015)
|
| A minor correction: It was not "Bay Of Tonkin". It was the "Gulf Of Tonkin". Yes, I remember it. I served from 1965 through 1969. Little known fact: it is also known as the USS Maddox Incident. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(6/27/2015)
|
Alas, I agree with Mr. Norris our 'modern' houses of worship are no longer sanctuaries respected by all. Indeed, quite the opposite, if the rantings of some of the more vitriolic religious zealots are ceded credence.
But I submit all of us have a vested interest in the continued health and well-being of Mr. Roof, the alleged Charleston shooter. First, because he's presently alive and available for extended interrogation and examination. Its reported he intended to commit suicide, ( or, possibly his programming failed at this point?). There is a great deal worth detailed examination in Mr. Roof's manifesto. Just as there is the background and history of the AME churches. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
