|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
jac
(8/29/2016)
|
It is amazing that otherwise rational people can be so stupid. The probability of being injured or killed in an automobile accident is probably 100 times greater than being shot by a person with a concealed carry license. Maybe even 1000 times greater. |
Comment by:
lbauer
(8/29/2016)
|
What these fool cannot seem to wrap their tiny little minds around is the simple fact that they have always been at risk from concealed weapons. All that stupid no carry rule did was disarm those inclined to obey the law. Those with harmful intent, not so much. |
Comment by:
Sosalty
(8/29/2016)
|
Which causes more folks to stay away from campus; "gun free zone" signs or law abiding productive individuals who are intelligent enough to carry self-defense weaponry? |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|