|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Gun Control Debate Continues Around Nation as School Year Begins
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
David Hogg has spent his first summer out of high school leading rallies from coast to coast. He's one of the survivors of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas shooting that left 17 people dead. Still, he says he supports the 2nd amendment. "It's ok if you own a gun. My father's a gun owner. Before i went on this tour, to learn about gun safety, I disassembled and assembled his gun." But he and his fellow students want what they call "common sense gun laws", including universal background checks and a ban on semi-automatic assault rifles.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/8/2018)
|
We will never allow this country to be led by immature adolescent minds-full-of-mush.
The MSM touting this meme are irresponsible and un-American. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
