|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
The Las Vegas Massacre Report and the Rise of Second Amendment Nihilism
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
And it’s absurd, in a mad way, because the premise of the killings was one that no other civilized country would have tolerated for a moment. Paddock bought fifty-five guns, mostly rifles, in the space of a year—most of them the kind of lethal weapons properly called assault rifles or military-style weapons, several augmented with an accessory known as a bump stock, which allowed for even more rapid firing. There is no reason on earth why any citizen of a democracy would ever need even one of these weapons, let alone fifty-five. Not to mention that the simple act of buying that many weapons of murder might be a sign that murder was being planned—an alert missed. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(8/10/2018)
|
"There is no reason on earth why any citizen of a democracy would ever need even one of these (AR-15s)."
It isn't called "The Bill of Needs," it's called "THE BILL OF RIGHTS."
I'd also note were are NOT a democracy, we are a REPRESENTATIVE REPUBLIC.
Paddock may have been a psychotic nut, but as the Latin phrase "abusum non tollit usum" ("bad use doesn't negate good use") states, such evil is not a good reason to diminish or trash the rights of everyone who did not commit a shooting spree. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/10/2018)
|
"properly called assault rifles"
BZZZZZT!
Automatic disqualifier (pun intended)
AR-15s and the like are NOT assault rifles, and no matter how many times these idiots are told so, they go "meh" and disregard it. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
