|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
WI: Candidates for Governor Weigh in on Gun Laws
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constituionnetwork.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
With the recent Pittsburgh Synagogue shooting, both candidates running for governor are revisiting gun laws. Democrat Tony Evers said on Monday, if elected, he’s willing to toughen licensing requirements on Wisconsin’s concealed carry law. It’s a bill his opponent Governor Scott Walker passed in 2011. Walker’s campaign said the governor does not support any changes to concealed carry law. |
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(10/31/2018)
|
| Any person advocating gun control, gun registration, etc., of law abiding citizens, does not deserve to be an elected representative. No law abiding citizen should ever take responsibility for the actions of criminals. Citizens must see that elected officials are bound by the chains of the Constitution. Persons of little character, or honor disobey their oath. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
