|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NC: What Turned Fury at North Carolina Muslim Neighbors to Murder
Submitted by:
Anonymous
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Whether the triple homicide in North Carolina was triggered by a parking dispute or by a hatred of Muslims or both, this is certain:
The murder weapon was a handgun.
Without the gun, there would have been no triple funeral on Thursday for 23-year-old Deah Shaddy Barakat and 21-year-old Yusor Mohammad and 19-year-old Razan Mohammad Abu-Salha. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(2/14/2015)
|
A most curious assumption on the part of Mr. Daley arises early in his diatribe when he asserts it was the gun's fault. Daley "overlooks" the perp was a self-avowed liberal and fan/supporter of liberal scribes, media and causes. Likewise Daley overlooks another real world reality. The perp, denied a gun by the state, could as easily armed himself with a variety of commonly available "weapons" from any hardware store.
Multiple reports, (including his own), indicate the perp was possessed of an extremely irascible/volitile nature. Indeed one might opine this "good liberal" was of an extremely intolerant nature. And then "acted out" his emotions.
Maybe we ought to be disarming liberals.... |
| Comment by:
teebonicus
(2/15/2015)
|
| I have it on good authority that The Daily Beast is published from Uranus. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence. Thus when my eldest son asked me what he should have done had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908 [by an Indian extremist opposed to Gandhi's agreement with Smuts], whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defend me, I told him it was his duty to defend me even by using violence. Hence it was that I took part in the Boer War, the so-called Zulu Rebellion and [World War I]. Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. — Mohandas K. Gandhi, Young India, August 11, 1920 from Fischer, Louis ed.,The Essential Gandhi, 1962 |
|
|
