|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(11/11/2017)
|
Sigh...another ignoramus who thinks the "well regulated militua" clause limits gun possession to militia members. Folks....we're losing the language! Even lawyers have exposed this corrupt interpretation! |
Comment by:
jac
(11/11/2017)
|
These people don't have a clue about the history behind the second amendment. Anyone that has read the federalist papers, or the writings of Madison and Jefferson understands the basis for the second amendment
These liberals spout their opinions as if they are based on fact when in actuality they are only their wishful thinking with no basis in reality.
There is no winning this argument with people to whom facts and history are irrelevant.
|
Comment by:
xqqme
(11/11/2017)
|
One simple review of pre-existing State Constitutional provisions on "arms" clearly shows that they were for personal protection, protection of family, home, and property, for defense of the States, and other lawful purposes. . Since murder, mayhem, robbery, and the like aren't lawful, there's no constitutional protection for using arms for these purposes, but the remainder remain. |
Comment by:
shootergdv
(11/12/2017)
|
We, the People, ARE the Minitemen ! |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. — Noah Webster in "An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution," 1787, in Paul Ford, ed., Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at p. 56 (New York, 1888). |
|
|