|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/27/2019)
|
What utter poppycock.
She blames McGlockton's death on SYG, yet SYG did not prevent the correct verdict. Indeed, SYG did not prevent the shooter from coming to trial.
In an inept burst of emotionalism, she defeats her own argument. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(8/27/2019)
|
This was never a syg case. The shooter fired as the victim walked away.
SYG laws only mean you're NOT under an obligation to retreat. It does not mean you can simply stand where you are and unjustifiably shoot someone as he leaves. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/27/2019)
|
MarkHamTownsend -
EGGS ACKLEY. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
