|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Ralph Northam’s Insane Gun-Grab Proposal
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
As Stephen Gutowski notes at the Free Beacon, there’s a truly radical proposal lurking in the Virginia governor’s push for gun control. From a press release:
Delegate Kathy Tran and Senator Adam Ebbin will patron legislation to ban the sale, purchase, possession, and transport of assault firearms in the Commonwealth. The bill also modifies the definition of assault firearm to any firearm that is equipped with a magazine that holds more than 10 rounds of ammunition. |
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(1/15/2019)
|
| Those who want to deprive you of your right to keep and bear arms are intending to deprive you of your freedom, period. The "Oath of Office" has teeth along with complete expectation that it be taken seriously. You do remember this right? "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will "Support" and "Defend" the Constitution of the United States". If you take an oath in a courtroom and lie...you know what happens. "Lying" or knowingly "Breaking" that oath should be considered more severe than being in a courtroom and lying. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(1/15/2019)
|
| Is there any more proof required that the elites want us disarmed? It doesn't matter if it's a flintlock or a AR-15 they DO NOT WANT US TO OWN IT!!!!!! ! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| ...If a man lies under oath or procures the lie of another under oath, if he perjures himself or suborns perjury, he is guilty under the statute law. Under the higher law, under the great law of morality and righteousness, he is precisely as guilty if, instead of lying in a court, he lies in a newspaper or on the stump; and in all probability, the evil effects of his conduct are infinitely more widespread and more pernicious. — Teddy Roosevelt - May 12, 1900 |
|
|
