|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Range Time with the S&W M&P45 Shield Pistol
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
There are some truly outstanding sub-compact defensive pistols chambered in 9 mm Luger on today’s market. These pistols are reliable, lightweight and easily concealed. Additionally, 9 mm Luger defensive ammunition has improved greatly in the last decade or two and recent studies by the FBI indicate that the 9 mm Luger, with proper ammunition, can be a very effective fight stopper. Combining the improved terminal ballistics of these modern 9 mm loads with these modern sub-compact pistols is a very logical choice for all-day concealed carry. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(9/2/2016)
|
"Is there a handgun that is as small and easy to conceal as a sub-compact 9 mm but offers the peace of mind of carrying a 45?"
I don't know, maybe a LM-4? (just kidding, I'm sure the Shield is quite an advancement over that manually operated pistol) |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
