|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Illinois girl, 14, tried to rob woman who shot her in chest, both charged, Chicago police say
Submitted by:
jac
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A teenage girl who was shot in the chest in a Chicago neighborhood Friday night is now facing an attempted robbery charge after officials said she tried to rob a woman she was meeting for a sale.
The Chicago Police Department said in a news release on Saturday the incident happened around 5:45 p.m. in the city's Little Village neighborhood, when 21-year-old Araceli Diaz met with the 14-year-old girl after the teenager arranged the meeting to buy a dog.
Diaz was subsequently arrested in Cicero about an hour after the shooting and charged with unlawful use of a weapon, according to police.
Submitter's note: Self defense can get you arrested in Chicago. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/3/2019)
|
How can lawful self-defense be "unlawful use of a weapon"?
The charge should be CCW without a valid permit. Just like Bernard Goetz, she carried unlawfully but used it lawfully. He was convicted on the carry charge, but acquitted on the more serious felony.
This is nonsense. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of The United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms... — Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, at 86-87 (Pierce & Hale, eds., Boston, 1850). |
|
|
