|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Gun safety over NRA propaganda
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"Unfortunately it appears that any time an individual starts a conversation with the word 'gun' in it, the walls go up and the posturing begins, as all the extremists race to the far corners of their respective fiefdoms."
"Guns are neither good nor bad, but more importantly, I believe that gun-safety laws are good and responsible. Over the course of my 25 years in health care, emergency and transplant medicine, I have seen firsthand the tragedies of irresponsible gun owners, and that, despite the significance of lives lost, the tragedy of preventative measures blocked at every turn by National Rifle Association zealots." ... |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(1/26/2015)
|
| Gee, the writer got thru one sentence without "erecting an anti-gun wall " of his own ! So much for a reasonable examination and debate of the issues ! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
