|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
CA: Another civil war, really?
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
When the confederacy decided to leave the union, the federal government did not wish them bon voyage. It launched a full scale war; and upon winning the war, the principle that the union could not be dissolved was enshrined.
As one of the states with the most aversion to guns and the strictest gun and ammunition control laws, California could not be in a worse position to fight the full force of the United States military should they somehow succeed in the quixotic quest to start a second civil war.
Those wishing to secede will have discovered too late that the purpose of the second amendment was to be able to resist a government which had become oppressive to them; it was never about shooting squirrels and deer. |
Comment by:
stevelync
(12/2/2016)
|
Seriously, if Kommiefornia wants to leave, let them. It'll be an improvement for everyone involved. |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(12/2/2016)
|
" ... Those wishing to secede will have discovered too late that the purpose of the second amendment was to be able to resist a government which had become oppressive to them ... "
Fedgov OPPRESSIVE to them? Considering their taxes and gunlaws, I suggest it's the California govt. that's "oppressive." Let 'em go? Sure, and Bon Voyage .... but the people there will still be stuck with petty tyrants. So why should I worry? Let them reap what they've sowed.................................... |
Comment by:
jdege
(12/2/2016)
|
The Union did not launch a full scale war, South Carolina did. |
Comment by:
Sosalty
(12/2/2016)
|
I think we should surrender to 'em and let Cali succeed. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence. Thus when my eldest son asked me what he should have done had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908 [by an Indian extremist opposed to Gandhi's agreement with Smuts], whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defend me, I told him it was his duty to defend me even by using violence. Hence it was that I took part in the Boer War, the so-called Zulu Rebellion and [World War I]. Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. — Mohandas K. Gandhi, Young India, August 11, 1920 from Fischer, Louis ed.,The Essential Gandhi, 1962 |
|
|