|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
KS: Reason has to return to gun law debate
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
I know this column will be wildly unpopular with many readers.
Honestly, I don’t want to write it. I have received all of the emails on this subject that I care to.
However, to do my part as an honest person seeking to use his voice to advance reasonable conversations on important topics, I have to address this issue again.
The lobbyist driven, legislator endorsed gun culture that conservative politics is espousing as the highest expression of liberty has to be stopped before we don’t recognize America anymore.
|
Comment by:
hisself
(5/19/2016)
|
OK, Mr. Patriot,
What part of "Shall NOT be infringed" do you not understand? |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(5/19/2016)
|
"Most of these fear-driven gun fetishists would, in reality, relieve their bladders down their pants legs should any situation arise that called for them to return fire."
Gee whizzz... last I checked maybe half a million to a million people used thier legal guns in self-defense each year against some criminal. I don't recall that any of these people peed their pants.
I think this author must be some type of sanctimonious jack-ass. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|