|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
SC: Man blames gun range for bullet in home
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"We cannot confirm that it did not come from there, nor can we confirm that it did, said Chief Deputy Creed Hashe.
Hashe said investigators spent about two hours on the range after the report.
It's about an 8-acre site and we were hearing anywhere from 10-12 gunshots in the area that we know for a fact were not coming from the gun range because we were actually on the scene there, said Hashe.
Hashe said a nearby hunter could very well have been behind the bullet. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(1/22/2015)
|
This story stresses something all gun owners must be constantly cognizant of. We own every projectile we discharge. And we're the obvious "target of opportunity" for any stray - or intentional - bullet a homeowner reports.
But there's a lot "missing" in the account given. We only "know" its reported the house is "1300 feet " from the range. What caliber/type of bullet was recovered ? What was the angle of the trajectory through the house ? What sort of construction comprised the impact area ? What's the location of the house in relation to the shooting butts ?
Hard for a small department to finance a serious forensic investigation of this sort of thing. Is that what someone is relying upon ? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
