
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NY: State Assembly Candidate Claims She’s Receiving Threats
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Christina Cardinale, D-Jamestown, wants the voters of Chautauqua County to know she is an advocate of responsible gun ownership.
“I am also pro-Second Amendment. I grew up in a pro-gun household, with a parent who is an avid hunter. I was taught the necessary skills and knowledge for gun ownership at a very young age,” she said.
Cardinale said she wants people to know she is pro-Second Amendment after receiving threats of violence because it’s assumed she is pro-gun control because she is a Democrat. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(6/5/2020)
|
I checked her website.
She's mealy-mouthed on 2A rights. She wants to 'narrow' the SAFEAct so NY gun owners 'feel' their rights aren't being infringed.
IOW, yer typical Democrat. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|