|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Here’s Why Gun Grabbers Are So Nasty
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"We’ve noted for a while now how nasty the forces of civilian disarmament have become in recent years. Since their failure to significantly move the anti-gun needle after Newtown — an opportunity they saw as a sure thing for rolling back Second Amendment rights — the gun-grabbing community seems to have ratcheted up (or down, really) the venom and vulgarity. One of our readers, Ozallos, posited the following theory under our post, ‘Why Are Anti-Gunners So Vile? – ConcealedNation.org Reads Their Hate Mail’ . . ." ... |
Comment by:
Millwright66
(3/23/2015)
|
A characteristic not limited to "gun grabbers". Fifty years' back (the Sixties), I had to change Sociology ****because I asked a very similar question about those espousing "civil rights". Mostly, I suspect, its because this type of personality has a superiority complex. Anyone confronting them is seen as "inferior", hence a "non-person" unworthy of debate or opinion. And you can treat a non-person anyway you choose, (at least in their lexicon).
A sterling current example of this is the on-going "AGCC" kerfuffle. Skeptics of advanced supportive data are ridiculed, hounded and professionally assassinated by its adherents - or rather - apostles/acolytes. Why expect the self-defense debate to be any different ? |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power." [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)] |
|
|