|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Can We Please Stop Celebrating Domestic Terrorists?
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
On August 25th, two men who were protesting the police shooting of Jacob Blake were shot and killed by a 17 year old with a rifle. The incident is still under investigation, but several chilling cell phone videos exist that document the situation (The video is disturbing, use viewer discretion, here is the link).
No matter how the investigation turns out, one thing is clear: we can’t have this. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/4/2020)
|
"Domestic terrorists?"
Pardon, but when these guys were shot, they weren't 'protesting,' they were ATTACKING this kid.
The videos clearly show that.
And yes, we CAN have this, and we will undoubtedly have it again if these violent thugs persist in their insurrectionist rampages. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
