|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
WA: The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Again and again we hear the Right assert: “Yeah, but it’s in the Constitution. I gotta Second Amendment right!” Unless you are a member of “(a) well regulated militia”, no you don’t, cowboy! Wanna kill your self? Help yourself. Wanna parade in front of your mirror with your commo and AR15? Go ahead, lick your lips, look bad. Wanna threaten and murder, look elsewhere than the Constitution to justify that. Look in vain and leave the rest of us the hell out of your fantasies – especially our families, our kids. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(5/15/2020)
|
Not this stupid "militia only" interpretation of the 2A!!. It's hard to believe this garbage interpretation is still around after U. S. v. Heller.
But then I forget the antigunners are still maintaining their shibboleths.
When the R. M. S. Titanic upended and sank, the rats were smart enough to run away from the encroaching ocean water, but there were passengers who refused to leave the "safety" of the huge ship.
Like antigunners .... the rats are smarter. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
