|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NY: Vote Republican to keep semi-automatic weapons, Colton man says
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
They have assured me that their party has no interest in confiscating their handguns.
The facts say otherwise.
The 2016 Democratic Party Platform states that Democrats will "keep weapons of war—such as assault weapons and large capacity ammunition magazines—off our streets." For a Democrat, the defining features of an assault weapon is that it is semi-automatic and has what they consider to be a high-capacity magazine. How high is high-capacity? In justifying his imaginary seven-round magazine, Governor Andrew Cuomo famously remarked, "No one needs ten bullets to kill a deer." |
Comment by:
Stripeseven
(10/27/2018)
|
The People of America have never authorized their elected representatives to destroy their Bill of Rights, The Peoples' Rights. Citizens must demand that their elected officials be bound by the chains of the Constitution. Persons of little character, or honor disobey their oath. Vote'em out...
|
Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/27/2018)
|
Excellent LTE. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|