|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/20/2019)
|
Da link she's'a no good.
Heah it be, dog.
https://www.roanoke.com/news/local/virginia-crime-commission-delves-into-data-what-works-to-reduce/article_768c077c-7ad7-542a-9510-360726328d10.html |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/20/2019)
|
“There are policies that we know can reduce violence.” - Lori Haas, mother of a survivor of the VT shooting.
No, there aren't. You HOPE that they can reduce violence, you THINK that they can reduce violence, but you don't KNOW that they can reduce violence.
The fact remains that laws that restrict peaceable people from exercising their natural, fundamental right to arms do NOTHING to affect criminals.
You posture and virtue signal, and the dirtballs LAUGH at you because they know the real score. Your motivation is understandable, but you are blinded by wishing and hoping to the detriment of everyone else's rights.
Sorry, but your 'answers' to this issue are unacceptable. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
