|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Dear Abby has a Change of Heart About Gun Advice
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
After gun safety advocates flooded her mailbox and social media pages, Dear Abby tweaked some lousy parenting advice she'd offered to a cautious new mom. In late June, Abby responded to "First-time mom in New Jersey," who wondered whether she should ask other parents if they have guns at home before allowing her daughter to play there. |
Comment by:
dasing
(7/4/2017)
|
Maybe the woman should teach HER children firearm safety!!!! |
Comment by:
shootergdv
(7/4/2017)
|
Geez, Abby. Any kitchen knives in the house ? Matches?Baseball bats? Tire tools ? |
Comment by:
MikeP
(7/4/2017)
|
Dear Abby You needn’t worry about offending any gun owners with the your question. The very reason you might be concerned is the same reason that a gun owner will not tell you they own a gun.
|
Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/4/2017)
|
Baloney. "Helicopter Parent" is a derogatory term for a reason. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|