|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(12/24/2018)
|
Of course it is a good idea. It doesn't matter where you live. Signs won't stop someone bent on mayhem and murder. The only think that will stop them is the proverbial good guy with a gun.
Furthermore, why haven't any school shootings happened at schools with armed teachers? Because victim disarmament zones only encourage the malcontents. They don't want to die. The last few school shooters surrendered rather than get shot. And one or two "resource officers" is insufficient security as was proven at Columbine and Parkland.
The stupid liberals that won't allow trained teachers and staff to be armed are delusional and placing the students at great risk. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
