|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(11/8/2018)
|
Neither of them will stop a rifle bullet, and that seems to be the weapon of choice in these mass shootings.
The only defense against a mass shooting is a good guy with a gun, which is unlikely given the liberal mindset to make schools victim disarmament zones. |
| Comment by:
jac
(11/8/2018)
|
There is no place for comments to the article. And no discussion in the article on ways to prevent or contain a school shooter such as arming school staff and making it known that the staff is armed.
Totally false security. When will the liberals figure out that the only real security is a good guy with a gun? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
