|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Guns Banned From Part Of NRA Convention, NRA Tells Members To Obey
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"The National Rifle Association is holding its annual convention in Nashville, Tennessee, this week, but guns will be banned in a major area of the gathering."
"The NRA broke the good and bad news to its members on its Facebook page:""'During the 2015 NRA Annual Meeting & Exhibits, lawfully carried firearms will be permitted in the Music City Center with the proper license in accordance with Tennessee law. Bridgestone Arena prohibits the possession of firearms. When carrying your firearm, remember to follow all federal, state and local laws.'" "Some Nashville hotels also do not allow guns." ... |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(4/8/2015)
|
| And this a "change" how ? Its ever been thus in my lifetime. The NRA has always respected the local laws of its convention hosts. It seems some segments of the media are trying, (almost to the point of absurdity), to create a "conflict" where there is none. Hostelries with a "prohibitive policy" regarding CCW or firearms will likely not be patronized by ANRA attendees. That's their economic loss and a small inconvenience to NRA members, who will doubtless remember their names. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
