|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
jac
(5/23/2015)
|
The hypocrisy of liberals never ceases to amaze me. You would think this woman could find a better cause to support. Something along the order of Moms Demand Your Mentally Defective Son Takes His Medicine.
Maybe they should lock her up in a mental ward for being delusional. |
Comment by:
mickey
(5/23/2015)
|
The "fact" that he owned guns????
And what's your source for this "fact"? Is is the woman that the rest of the article is devoted to proving dishonest? Why should we believe her claim that her crazy autistic son bought a bunch of guns when he turned 18? |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|