|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
AZ: Parents of NAU Shooting Suspect Say They'll Rid Home of Guns
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://inrigare.wordpress.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The parents of a man charged in the fatal shooting of a Northern Arizona University student last fall say they will remove all guns from their home and relocate to Coconino County, if necessary, should a judge agree to release their son. Superior Court Judge Dan Slayton rejected a request in February to allow Steven Jones to live with his parents in Maricopa County pending trial. But the judge left open the possibility of home confinement once he had more information on monitoring, access to weapons, potential searches of Jones' parents' home and counseling. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/13/2016)
|
Keep him locked up, and keep your guns.
Sheesh. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(4/13/2016)
|
Yeah, just keep your kid locked up while awaiting trial, when he claims a herd of drunken idiots ran at him after threatening to kill him, and the dead guy was shot at very close range, 5-10' according to the police report.
Tox reports say the victims/attackers all had drugs and/or 0.09-0.21% alcohol in them.
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
