|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
New Texas A&M Study Says Concealed Carry Licenses Don't Reduce Crime
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Every legislative session Texas lawmakers fight to make access to guns less restrictive. In the past lawmakers would use state crime statistics to push gun legislation at the capitol.
But a new study published in the Journal of Criminology by researchers at the Texas A&M Health Science Center School of Public Health may be poking holes in claims that increasing the number of conceal handgun permits leads to less crime.
The study’s leading researcher Dr. Charles Phillips said past studies on the issue were limited to just a before and after snapshot on crime rates from a statewide perspective. |
| Comment by:
jac
(9/26/2015)
|
This doesn't match the fact that violent crime has decreased in recent years at the same time that concealed carry licenses were exploding.
It sounds to me like a hoplophobic professor manipulated or cherry picked the data to support his liberal bias. |
| Comment by:
jac
(9/26/2015)
|
See the following:
http://bearingarms.com/academic-study-asserts-concealed-carry-doesnt-affect-crime/ |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/26/2015)
|
Any "professor" who undertakes this kind of "study" does it for one reason and one reason only - to misrepresent the facts to support his preconceived conclusions.
IOW, these "professors" are nothing but left-wing shills and propagandists, posturing under a faux mantle of "legitimacy". |
| Comment by:
Uncommon1
(9/28/2015)
|
| In 1991, there were about 6-8 car jackings in Dallas per week. In 1995, Texas passed Concealed Carry. Car jackings dropped to almost zero. This is not a coincidence. Car jackers do not want to be shot. Period. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
