|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
ID: Permitless Carry Doesn't Mean You Can Carry Anywhere
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Regardless of the new legislation, you still can’t really carry “in the city” without a permit, and our lawmakers are doing Idahoans a huge legal disservice by making us think we can. One example, the Federal Gun Free School Zone Act prohibits firearms of any kind within 1,000 feet of a school ground, and not the center of the school, but the edge of the property. “School” is defined as K-12 and includes public schools, private schools, parochial schools, and likely home schools. |
| Comment by:
stevelync
(4/10/2016)
|
The entire first paragraph is a lie which makes it highly likely the rest of the article is too.
The gun-free schools act isn't legally enforceable and was basically shot down.
I'm curious of the propagandist writing the piece has ever considered how many home surrounding that 1000ft GFZ has firerms in them.
Just one more reason members of the Propaganda Corps are going to lay scatter in significant numbers across the coming battlefield. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
