| 
            
              | 
 | 
                
                
                  
                    | 
                              
                                   
                                        | 
                              
                              
                              NOTE! 
                               
                              This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
                      free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
                      Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
                      reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
                      any other living person besides the one who posted them.
                      Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
                              comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
                              Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
                              bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
                              other small-minded people.  Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
                              
                              
                                         |  
                         
                         The
                      Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
                         
                                       
                                            
                      
     
  
    | TX: Strict Interpretation Submitted by: 
			
Mark A. Taff
 Website: http://www.marktaff.com
 | 
			There 
				are 3  comments 
			 	on this storyPost Comments | Read Comments
 |  
    | When someone cites “The Second Amendment” we are supposed to bow our heads in some sort of divine reverence. When someone says we don’t want to infringe on the rights of “law-abiding citizens” we are supposed to recognize their undefined minority rights over our right to not be killed by guns in school, at the theater or just going about our daily lives. The Second Amendment is specific about the rights it is talking about. It isn’t hunting.
 
 We should pass a federal law which prohibits anyone to own a gun unless they can demonstrate a need based upon self-defense.
 |  
 
 
     
  
    | Comment by: 
     lucky5eddie
     (10/10/2019) |  
    | Links to the wrong story.  A good story, but not the one advertised. |  
 
 
     
  
    | Comment by: 
     PHORTO
     (10/10/2019) |  
    | Wrong link. |  
 
 
     
  
    | Comment by: 
     PHORTO
     (10/10/2019) |  
    | Based upon the synopsis, I say, get a life. We have the right, the Framers identified and codified it, it isn't granted by government and government cannot remove it, so.... 
 ...GET LOST.
 |  
 
 |  |  
              | QUOTES
                TO REMEMBER |  
              | 
                    
                      | By calling attention to a well-regulated militia for the security of the Nation, and the right of each citizen to keep and bear arms, our Founding Fathers recognized the essentially civilian nature of our economy.  Although it is extremely unlikely that the fears of governmental tyranny, which gave rise to the second amendment, will ever be a major danger to our Nation, the amendment still remains an important declaration of our basic military-civilian relationships, in which every citizen must be ready to participate in the defense of the country.  For that reason I believe the second amendment will always be important. --JOHN F. KENNEDY |  |  |