|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Protect 2nd Amendment with your vote in November
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
As with our guy holding the baseball, these leaders believe that in spite of the 100% failure rate of this practice in other countries, somehow it will work this time. Soon after this edict goes into effect, which negates citizens’ means of personal protection, the people who have succumbed to the tyrannical gun confiscation will be confronted by armed criminals.
As has been the result in 100% of these programs, the criminal activity against them will increase dramatically. Being unarmed, they become easy prey for members of the criminal element, who somehow never got around to turning in their guns. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(6/13/2020)
|
| Superb article. Irrefutable argument. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. — Noah Webster in "An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution," 1787, in Paul Ford, ed., Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at p. 56 (New York, 1888). |
|
|
