|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Elites Reserve the Right to Decree What is "Fake" and What is "News"
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Legacy media corporations like the New York Times and Washington Post have big problems right now.
Consumption of their product is dropping. Public confidence in them has tanked. And in front of the nation and the world, they blew the biggest political story in decades by continually pushing the falsehood that Donald Trump had no chance to win the presidential election.
Any rational thinker might take some time for introspection and consider a course correction. But rational is rarely a word used to describe the legacy media. |
| Comment by:
stevelync
(12/2/2016)
|
| Imagine that, the lying trash of the Propaganda Corps defining "fake news". |
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(12/2/2016)
|
| What if we knew Obama's real past? Reminds me of a cop killing in Bakersfield, they put forth every half truth piece of dirt out on the officer and painted the car thief who shot him in face with a shotgun (leaving behind wife and kids) as a regular guy (not). After a 2nd trial, the cop killer walked. Spin exaggerate bits of good about the bad guy, then poo poo and make up bad about the good guy. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence. Thus when my eldest son asked me what he should have done had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908 [by an Indian extremist opposed to Gandhi's agreement with Smuts], whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defend me, I told him it was his duty to defend me even by using violence. Hence it was that I took part in the Boer War, the so-called Zulu Rebellion and [World War I]. Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. — Mohandas K. Gandhi, Young India, August 11, 1920 from Fischer, Louis ed.,The Essential Gandhi, 1962 |
|
|
