|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
sheldonsthomas
(2/26/2016)
|
Nothing actually changed, merely shuffled the wording. See SB 130 2016 (4)(b): (4) Any person who recreationally discharges a firearm
15 outdoors, including target shooting, in an area that the person
16 knows or reasonably should know is primarily residential in
17 nature and that has a residential density of one or more
18 dwelling units per acre, commits a misdemeanor of the first
19 degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. This
20 subsection does not apply:
22 performing official duties requiring the discharge of a firearm;
23 (b) If, under the circumstances, the discharge does not
24 pose a reasonably foreseeable risk to life, safety, or property;
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
